Do spam trigger words actually send emails to the spam folder?

Rarely on their own. Modern filters (Gmail, Outlook, Apple) weight sender reputation and recipient engagement far above content — authentication, complaint rate, bounce rate, spam-trap hits and whether people open and reply. Trigger words are a small, tie-breaking signal that mostly bites when a sender is already borderline. A reputable sender can use 'free'; a cold, unauthenticated one lands in spam with spotless copy.

What are the most common spam trigger words?

They cluster into money and get-rich terms (cash, make money, lowest price), act-now urgency (urgent, limited time, expires today), medical and pharma bait (weight loss, no prescription), over-promised guarantees (risk-free, no obligation, 100% guaranteed) and winner/free hype (congratulations, you're a winner, free gift). The checker above groups every match into these categories so you can see which cluster is carrying the risk.

Is it bad to use ALL CAPS in an email?

In moderation it is fine; as a habit it hurts. ALL-CAPS words read as shouting to a person and correlate with the bulk senders filters distrust, and shouted copy earns deletes — which damage placement more than the capitals themselves. Sentence case carries the same words without the flag, so there is rarely a reason to pay the cost.

Do exclamation marks and $$$ trigger spam filters?

Stacked punctuation — !!!, $$$, ??? — is a well-known promotional tell, and this tool flags it. But like trigger words, it is a minor content signal, not a filter rule that counts marks. The stronger reason to cut it is that it reads as low-quality to a human, and human engagement is what actually moves your placement. One exclamation mark does the job of three.

Does this spam checker guarantee my email reaches the inbox?

No, and any tool that claims to is selling you something. This checks content only. Inbox placement is decided by authentication (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), your complaint and bounce rates, spam-trap hits and how recipients engage — none of which a word scan can see. Treat a clean read as necessary but never sufficient.

Does this tool send my email content anywhere?

No. The entire scan runs in your browser — the word matching, the ALL-CAPS and punctuation checks, and the scoring. There is no request, no account and no storage. Close the tab and the text is gone, which is the point when you are checking an unsent campaign.

The checker flagged a word that is normal for my business. Should I remove it?

Not necessarily. The list is indicative, and context decides everything — 'free' in 'free shipping' from a trusted sender is not the problem 'free money' from a cold sender is. Use the flags to prompt a second look, not as a rule. The signal worth acting on is a stack of trigger words plus shouting plus punctuation together, which is the combination filters actually score.

What should I fix before editing my copy for spam words?

Authentication first — get SPF, DKIM and DMARC passing, because it is the biggest lever and no rewrite touches it. Then your list quality and engagement: sending to dead addresses hurts placement more than any word. Copy is worth editing last, and even then the goal is to remove the stacked, shouted, punctuation-heavy patterns, not to reach zero flags.

← All apps

Spam Word Checker

Name: Orbit MCP
Availability: InStock

See the trigger words, shouting and punctuation that read as spam — before you hit send. Runs entirely in your browser.

Your email

Subject line

Body copy

0 words· scanned live in your browser, nothing sent anywhere.

Money & incomeUrgency & pressureMedical & pharmaGuarantees & risk-freeFreebies & hype

What this does and doesn't tell you

This flags content patterns filters have penalised for years. It is indicative guidance, not a promise of inbox placement — deliverability is driven by sending reputation and recipient engagement, not word choice. What actually decides deliverability covers the levers that move it: authentication, list quality and engagement.

Content risk readindicative

Paste a subject line or body to scan it for trigger words, shouting and stacked punctuation.

Checks

Note: Paste a subject line or body to scan
Everything runs in your browser — nothing you paste is sent, stored or logged anywhere.
Note: Indicative, not a guarantee
This checks content only. Real inbox placement is driven by authentication (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), complaint and bounce rates, spam-trap hits and recipient engagement — not word choice. Treat a clean read as necessary, never sufficient.

What a spam-word checker can and can't tell you about the inbox

Trigger words are the part of deliverability everyone can see, so they get all the attention. They are also the part that matters least. This tool flags them honestly — and is equally honest that clearing them is table stakes, not a ticket to the inbox.

Content is a tie-breaker, not the decision

Gmail, Outlook and Apple decide placement overwhelmingly on who is sending and how people react — authentication, complaint rate, bounce rate, spam-trap hits, and whether recipients open, read and reply. Word choice is a small, late signal that mostly matters when everything else is borderline.

That is why a reputable sender can put the word 'free' in a subject line and land in the inbox, while a cold, unauthenticated sender with pristine copy lands in spam. The checker above removes an own goal. It cannot manufacture a reputation you have not earned.

The five clusters, and why they carry different weight

Money and get-rich language, act-now urgency, and medical or pharma terms are the heaviest — they are the vocabulary of the scams filters were built to stop, so pharma bait scores highest here. Over-promised guarantees (risk-free, no obligation) and winner/free/prize hype are lighter, because plenty of legitimate offers use them.

The point of the breakdown is to stop you reacting to a single word. One 'guaranteed' in a warranty email is nothing. Three money terms, two of them shouted, next to a countdown is a pattern — and it is the pattern, not any word, that a filter scores.

Shouting and punctuation travel with spam for a reason

ALL-CAPS words and stacked punctuation — !!!, $$$, ??? — are flagged not because a filter counts exclamation marks, but because they correlate with the low-quality bulk senders filters already distrust. They also correlate with low human engagement: people delete shouting, and deletes hurt you more than the punctuation ever did.

The fix is free every time. Sentence case says the same words. One exclamation mark lands harder than three. The tool marks these in place so you can see how much of your copy is emphasis doing the work that a sharper sentence should.

This runs on your machine, and the list is indicative

Every scan happens in your browser. Nothing you paste is uploaded, stored or logged — close the tab and it is gone. That matters when the thing you are checking is an unsent campaign.

The word list is a compilation of the spam-trigger terms that circulate on the well-known public lists, and it is a starting point for a human read rather than an authority. Filters do not publish their rules, they change constantly, and context decides everything — so use the flags to prompt a second look, not as a pass/fail gate.

What to fix first when the read comes back hot

Start with authentication, because it is the largest lever and nothing here touches it: get SPF, DKIM and DMARC passing before you touch a word. Then look at the list you are sending to and the engagement it produces — a re-engagement pass on dead addresses moves placement more than any rewrite.

Only then is copy worth editing, and even then the goal is not zero flags. It is to remove the stacked, shouted, punctuation-heavy combinations that read as bulk promotional mail, while keeping the plain, specific language that reads as a real message from a real sender.

Frequently asked questions

Do spam trigger words actually send emails to the spam folder?: Rarely on their own. Modern filters (Gmail, Outlook, Apple) weight sender reputation and recipient engagement far above content — authentication, complaint rate, bounce rate, spam-trap hits and whether people open and reply. Trigger words are a small, tie-breaking signal that mostly bites when a sender is already borderline. A reputable sender can use 'free'; a cold, unauthenticated one lands in spam with spotless copy.
What are the most common spam trigger words?: They cluster into money and get-rich terms (cash, make money, lowest price), act-now urgency (urgent, limited time, expires today), medical and pharma bait (weight loss, no prescription), over-promised guarantees (risk-free, no obligation, 100% guaranteed) and winner/free hype (congratulations, you're a winner, free gift). The checker above groups every match into these categories so you can see which cluster is carrying the risk.
Is it bad to use ALL CAPS in an email?: In moderation it is fine; as a habit it hurts. ALL-CAPS words read as shouting to a person and correlate with the bulk senders filters distrust, and shouted copy earns deletes — which damage placement more than the capitals themselves. Sentence case carries the same words without the flag, so there is rarely a reason to pay the cost.
Do exclamation marks and $$$ trigger spam filters?: Stacked punctuation — !!!, $$$, ??? — is a well-known promotional tell, and this tool flags it. But like trigger words, it is a minor content signal, not a filter rule that counts marks. The stronger reason to cut it is that it reads as low-quality to a human, and human engagement is what actually moves your placement. One exclamation mark does the job of three.
Does this spam checker guarantee my email reaches the inbox?: No, and any tool that claims to is selling you something. This checks content only. Inbox placement is decided by authentication (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), your complaint and bounce rates, spam-trap hits and how recipients engage — none of which a word scan can see. Treat a clean read as necessary but never sufficient.
Does this tool send my email content anywhere?: No. The entire scan runs in your browser — the word matching, the ALL-CAPS and punctuation checks, and the scoring. There is no request, no account and no storage. Close the tab and the text is gone, which is the point when you are checking an unsent campaign.
The checker flagged a word that is normal for my business. Should I remove it?: Not necessarily. The list is indicative, and context decides everything — 'free' in 'free shipping' from a trusted sender is not the problem 'free money' from a cold sender is. Use the flags to prompt a second look, not as a rule. The signal worth acting on is a stack of trigger words plus shouting plus punctuation together, which is the combination filters actually score.
What should I fix before editing my copy for spam words?: Authentication first — get SPF, DKIM and DMARC passing, because it is the biggest lever and no rewrite touches it. Then your list quality and engagement: sending to dead addresses hurts placement more than any word. Copy is worth editing last, and even then the goal is to remove the stacked, shouted, punctuation-heavy patterns, not to reach zero flags.

Built into Orbit

Deliverability in Orbit

Orbit checks the things that actually decide placement — SPF, DKIM and DMARC authentication, list and engagement signals, and a full render-and-QA gate — before a send goes out. Claude can audit a domain's email auth and flag the deliverability risks a word scan can't see.

Orbit web apps